Everybody likes to get good reviews for their books, and I've been fortunate to get lots of them over the years. I just received a great one for The Good, The Bad and The Murderous. In a section headed "He Did It Again!" reviewer Sylvia Cochran at The Deepening wrote:
"Kind readers know that I am a fan of Chester Campbell’s writings. He 'gets'
detective fiction on a gut-level. There is no contrived dialog, questionable
literary tactic or predictable plot turn. Mystery buffs, who are strong
aficionados of the Chekhov’s gun technique, most certainly celebrate the
author’s solemn dedication to not litter the plot with confusing and pointless
elements. Instead, there is no hole in the plot and all loose ends are
tightened neatly before the last page. (Did I mention that this book is
I've never received a trashy review like some of the one-star diatribes I've seen on Amazon, but I've had a few that are a mixture of good and not so good. That's an interesting gray area. The conventional wisdom says to just forget it and move on. Be happy they mentioned your book.
Looking at the situation a bit more philosophically, it fulfills the reviewers job of giving an opinion as to the strong points and weak points in the story. What you have to remember is that this isn't rocket science. It's strictly one person's opinion. It's the same state of affairs you run into when querying an agent or an editor. What one person dislikes, another may praise.
In the case of this review, after saying how the crime was solved amounted to "a good study of methodical detective work," the reviewer concluded:
"If I’m going to buy a thriller I want foul language, aggression and
sexual tension. But if I’m looking for a well-written murder mystery,
this book would do fine."
I mentioned in an earlier post that the book started out like a mystery and ended like a thriller. Before the cover was finished, the publisher decided to call it a "Sid Chance Thriller." Thrillers seem to be the genre of preference these days. As I said, opinions differ. If throwing F bombs around like cigarette butts is a requirement for a thriller, I suppose I'll never write one. I see no need for it. In the few of his thrillers I've read, Harlan Coben didn't use a lot of foul language.
If several reviewers make similar critical remarks about a book, it's time to reevaluate. But debating whether something is or isn't a thriller hardly seems worth the effort. I'll just accept my reviews and be happy with them.